Hard and Soft Drugs—Position Statement
We feel that it is important to maintain the distinction between
what are traditionally considered hard and soft drugs. In recent years this
distinction has been blurred by the U.S. government in an attempt to
discourage the use of “soft drugs” and to emphasize the government’s position
that these drugs are really no different than “hard drugs.” Furthermore, some people would consider the
use of the term “soft drugs” to imply that no harm is associated with using
these substances and to tacitly condone their use. We feel the distinction is
important to realistically convey the relative risk of developing an addiction.
This attribute is independent of any potentially adverse health-effects and
does not address the sociopolitical issue of using any mildly psychoactive
substance.
|
Traditional
Distinction Amongst Drugs
|
|
“Hard Drugs”
|
“Soft Drugs”
|
Commonly Used Substances
|
|
cocaine
heroin
methamphetamine
secobarbital
|
ecstasy (MDMA)
diazepam (Valium)
marijuana
most psychotherapeutic drugs1
|
alcoholic
beverages
caffeine-containing products
nicotine-containing products
sugar-containing products
|
|
High
addiction liability
|
Moderate to
low addiction liability
|
Commonly used
without apparent addiction2
|
|
Notes: (1) abused in higher than therapeutically administered doses
(2) although problematic substance use can occur for all of these substances
(e.g., alcoholism), these substances are also used by millions of people daily
without developing an apparent addiction
|
Speed Kills . . .
Read it, learn it, believe it!

© 2007 Addiction
Science Network
Report technical problems
to: ASNwebmaster.